In an article from Big Jolly Politics by David Jennings, it's about the Texas DREAM act and the importance of the act for those that struggle to gain legal status. Also, the article is about the authors feelings of Greg Abbotts position and where he stands in relations with the act.
In
summary, many republican candidates that are running for Lt. Governor in Texas
have gone against the DREAM act(which originally was introduced twelve years
ago by Dick Durbin and Orrin Hatch). The Texas DREAM act is a conservative
policy signed by Rick Perry, it requires children whose parents brought them to
the U.S. without going through the proper procedure for legal status. With the candidates
for Lt. Governor already going against the act, it's harder to not go against the policy for Greg
Abbott. Many people including the author believe Greg Abbott should take
responsibility and be a leader in the Texas GOP. Furthermore, he needs to help
the base understand that the conservative policy would be helpful for the
Republican party.
The
authors intended audience in the article could be a focus toward many
republicans in office or those running for office. However, the author mentions
Greg Abbott multiple times. The author sends a direct message to the soon to be
governor stating that he needs to make his own decisions on behalf of the
policy that could impact the future for immigration. Also the author states,
that Greg Abbott needs to make an effort to not be influenced by the candidates(Lt.
Governor) opinions because they could alter his view. In the entire article, it
seems the author did not make use of any evidentiary support with his statements.
The
authors argument works for those that believe every person deserves a chance to
gain legal status, especially the children that had no choice but to come here
illegally. However, this argument wouldn’t work for those that believe "illegal's"
shouldn't have an opportunity to gain legal status including the children. And
for those that believe every person from a different country should go through
the legalizing process in order to be in the U.S. Why? Because the authors
argument is a support for the children that were brought to the U.S. illegally.
For example, the author states, "It makes no sense to educate these
children and then deny those that are capable of furthering their education the
opportunity to do so."
In
agreement with the authors argument, I believe there needs to be a leader to
rise from either party: Republican or Democrat. In the author's view, the
leader has to be Greg Abbot, and believes Greg Abbott has to be a person who
will stick to his gut and not be influenced by other candidates thoughts on the
Texas Dream act. Because it is the right thing to do for these children and it
is in the best long-term interest of the State of Texas.
No comments:
Post a Comment